Before reading this article I made a point to do a quick
search into Web 2.0. Web 2.0 has appeared several times in this class and I
have used context clues to determine what it means, however, I felt in necessary
to determine a solid definition of Web 2.0 in order to properly understand this
article. After brief research on Web 2.0 I came to the understanding that it
represented use of the internet beyond the static web pages that were typical
in the early days of the internet. In particular, Web 2.0 focuses on the social
media aspect and the ability to communicate and collaborate with other people.
Affordances
is another term that I was not very familiar with. Luckily the article explains
the term rather thoroughly. To generalize, affordances are not marked by what a
technology can do and all of its features, but rather, what the technology
allows its users to do. The article goes on to list a number of affordances
that Voice Thread allows students to do. The list is quite expansive, and
truthfully, I do not completely understand exactly what each affordance means,
but I imagine that I will come to greater understand these affordances after
using Voice Thread hands on. Overall, the biggest takeaway from this article was
a new manner in which to view technology in terms of educational value. The
final sentence of the article sums this idea up well, “To ask not what the tool
can do, but what their students can do with the tool.”
I like your explanation and summary of this article. I try to remember affordances is like "affording" something, just like in terms of money. Affordances is what technology allows us to do and how we can use it to our advantage.
ReplyDeleteYou actually had it spelled out, "the affordance." "To view technology in terms of educational value." :D
ReplyDelete